This posting follows Matt Stevenson's notes for Math 731 (Fall 2017) at the University of Michigan. Various references available in the notes will not be specified here.
Group schemes. Let S be a scheme. A group scheme over S (also called an S-group) is a group object in \textbf{Sch}_{S}, the category of S-schemes. Concretely, this means an S-scheme G such that the functor h_{G} = \mathrm{Hom}_{S}(-, G) : \textbf{Sch}_{S}^{\mathrm{op}} \rightarrow \textbf{Set} factors through the forgetful functor \textbf{Grp} \rightarrow \textbf{Set}. We say a group scheme G over S is commutative if G(T) := h_{G}(T) is an abelian group for each S-scheme T.
We now give examples. We will focus on the affine case S = \mathrm{Spec}(R), although it should be possible to use general S by gluing affine pieces.
Example 1. Consider \mathbb{G}_{a} = \mathbb{G}_{a, R} := \mathrm{Spec}(R[t]). For any R-scheme T, we have \mathbb{G}_{a}(T) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathrm{Spec}(R)}(T, \mathbb{G}_{a}) \simeq \Gamma(T, \mathscr{O}_{T}), where the isomorphism is taken in \textbf{Set}, given by \phi \mapsto \phi^{*}(t). This map is functorial in T, varying in \textbf{Sch}_{R}, and the right-hand side gives the functor into \textbf{Grp}, where the group structure is given by the addition. We see that \mathbb{G}_{a} is a (commutative) group scheme.
Example 2. Consider \mathbb{G}_{m} = \mathbb{G}_{m, R} := \mathrm{Spec}(R[t, t^{-1}]). For any R-scheme T, we have \mathbb{G}_{m}(T) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathrm{Spec}(R)}(T, \mathbb{G}_{m}) \simeq \Gamma(T, \mathscr{O}_{T})^{\times}, where the isomorphism is taken in \textbf{Set}, given by \phi \mapsto \phi^{*}(t). This map is functorial in T, varying in \textbf{Sch}_{R}, and the right-hand side gives the functor into \textbf{Grp}, where the group structure is given by the multiplication. We see that \mathbb{G}_{m} is a (commutative) group scheme.
Example 3. We define \mathrm{GL}_{n} = \mathrm{GL}_{n, R} := \mathrm{Spec}(R[t_{ij}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n}[1/\mathrm{det}]). For any R-scheme T, we have \mathrm{GL}_{n}(T) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathrm{Spec}(R)}(T, \mathrm{Spec}(R[t_{ij}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n}[1/\mathrm{det}])) \simeq \mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathscr{O}_{T}(T)), the general linear group of n \times n matrices over the global sections of T, given by \phi \mapsto [\phi^{*}(t_{ij})]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n}. This is functorial in T, and the right hand-side gives the functor into \textbf{Grp} given by the matrix multiplication. This shows that \mathrm{GL}_{n} is a group scheme.
Example 4. We define \mu_{n} = \mu_{n, R} := \mathrm{Spec}(R[t]/(t^{n}-1)). For any R-scheme T, we have \mu_{n}(T) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathrm{Spec}(R)}(T, \mathrm{Spec}(R[t]/(t^{n}-1))) \simeq \{f \in \mathscr{O}_{T}(T)^{\times} : f^{n} = 1\}, given by \phi \mapsto \phi^{*}(\bar{t}), which is functorial in T, and the right hand-side gives the functor into \textbf{Grp} given by the matrix multiplication. This shows that \mu_{n} is a (commutative) group scheme. The group structures are coming from multiplications of \mathscr{O}_{T}(T)^{\times}.
Remark. The behavior of \mu_{n, R} depends on the characteristic of R.
First, consider R = \mathbb{C}. Then the equation t^{n} = 1 has n distinct solutions in \mathbb{C}, so \mu_{n} = \mathrm{Spec}\left(\frac{\mathbb{C}[t]}{(t^{n} - 1)}\right) \simeq \bigsqcup_{z \in \mu_{n}(\mathbb{C})}\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{C}) \simeq \mu_{n}(\mathbb{C}), which is in particular smooth over \mathbb{C}. It turns out that all group schemes in characteristic 0 are smooth, by a theorem due to Oort. (We will see this later.)
On the other hand, when R = \mathbb{F}_{p} for a prime p, then \mu_{p} = \mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_{p}[t]/(t^{p} - 1)) = \mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_{p}[t]/(t - 1)^{p}), so \mu_{n} is a non-reduced scheme. Moreover, we note that \mu_{p} is not smooth over \mathbb{F}_{p} as the derivative of (t - 1)^{p} in t vanishes. In this case, note that \mu_{p} = \mu_{p, \mathbb{F}_{p}} is a point. Note that for any \mathbb{F}_{p}-algebra A that is a domain, there is only one \mathbb{F}_{p}-algebra map \mathbb{F}_{p}[t]/(t-1)^{p} \rightarrow A because the only a \in A such that (a - 1)^{p} = 0 must be 1 as A is a domain. Hence, we have \mu_{p, \mathbb{F}_{p}}(A) is a singleton. However, when A is not a domain, this may not be the case. For instance, take A = \mathbb{F}_{p}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^{2}). We have \begin{align*} \mu_{p,\mathbb{F}_{p}}\left( \frac{\mathbb{F}_{p}[\epsilon]}{(\epsilon^{2})} \right) &= \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_{p})}\left( \mathrm{Spec}\left( \frac{\mathbb{F}_{p}[\epsilon]}{(\epsilon^{2})} \right), \mu_{p,\mathbb{F}_{p}} \right) \\ &\simeq \{1 + b\bar{\epsilon} \in \mathbb{F}_{p}[\epsilon]/(\epsilon^{2}) : b \in \mathbb{F}_{p}\}\end{align*}, given by \phi \mapsto \phi^{*}(\bar{t}). The last set has p elements and p > 1.
More conventions/definitions. For convenience, we shall call a group scheme over a base scheme S an S-group. Again, an S-group is by definition a certain functor \textbf{Sch}_{S}^{\mathrm{op}} \rightarrow \textbf{Grp}, and we define an S-group map to be a natural transformation between two S-groups. With this definition, we see that the S-groups form a category. Note that given an S-group map f : G \rightarrow H and an S-group T, the corresponding map f_{T} : G(T) \rightarrow H(T) is a group homomorphism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
\mathbb{Z}_{p}[t]/(P(t)) is a DVR if P(t) is irreducible in \mathbb{F}_{p}[t]
Let p be a prime and P(t) \in \mathbb{Z}_{p}[t] a monic polynomial whose image in \mathbb{F}_{p} modulo p (which we also denote by $...
-
In the previous posting , I wanted to know how to show that the Picard group of a \mathbb{P}^{n}-bundle of a nice enough scheme X (over ...
-
Bézout's theorem is one of the theorems I was scared of. Let alone its proof, I was always uncomfortable about the word "multiplic...
No comments:
Post a Comment