Processing math: 0%

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Cross ratio

I remember that in a complex analysis course and a combinatorics course, my teachers both discussed about cross ratio. I recently realized that Vakil's notes (19.9) contains a nice exposition about this, which I choose to regurgitate here with a bit more elementary explanations.

Let us work over a field k. We can identify \mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{P}^{n}) = \mathrm{PGL}_{n+1}(k) = \mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(k)/k^{\times} because giving an automorphism \pi : \mathbb{P}^{n} \rightarrow \mathbb{P}^{n} is the same as choosing a k-linear automorphism of H^{0}(\mathbb{P}^{n}, \mathscr{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}}(1)) = kx_{0} + \cdots + kx_{n} up to nonzero global sections of \mathbb{P}^{n}, which consists of precisely k^{\times}. If we consider this k-linear automorphism as A \in \mathrm{PGL}_{n+1}(k), one can check that on \mathbb{P}^{n}(k), the map \pi is given by x = [x_{0} : \cdots : x_{n}] \mapsto Ax. Here, we note that x is seen as an (n+1) \times 1 column vector.

One can check that given any distinct w, x, y \in \mathbb{P}^{1}(k), there is precisely one A \in \mathrm{PGL}_{2}(k) such that A : (w, x, y) \mapsto (0, 1, \infty), where we wrote a = [a : 1] for any a \in k = \mathbb{A}^{1}(k) and \infty = [1:0]. Even though it is a bit convoluted-looking, one can even write down explicitly what A is. (Of course, it will be only unique up to a multiple of an element in k^{\times}.) The exact expression is the following:

A = \begin{bmatrix}x_{2}(w_{1}y_{2} - y_{1}w_{2}) & -x_{1}(w_{1}y_{2} - y_{1}w_{2}) \\ -w_{2}(y_{1}x_{2} - x_{1}y_{2}) & w_{1}(y_{1}x_{2} - x_{1}y_{2})\end{bmatrix},

where w = [w_{1} : w_{2}] and similarly for x and y. Given any other k-point z = [z_{1} : z_{2}] of the projective line, the cross ratio of the four points w, x, y, z is defined as Az.

Motivation for the nomenclature. We have 5 cases.

Case 1. Consider the case where w, x, y, z \neq \infty so that we can write w = [w : 1] and similarly for x, y, z. Then the cross ratio of w, x, y, z is precisely

\frac{(w -y)(z - x)}{(w - z)(y - x)}.

Case 2. Let w = \infty = [1 : 0]. Then the cross ratio is

\frac{z - x}{y - x}.

Case 3. Let x = \infty = [1 : 0]. Then the cross ratio is

\frac{w - y}{w - z}.

Case 4. Let y = \infty = [1 : 0]. Then the cross ratio is

\frac{x - z}{w - z}.

Case 5. Let z = \infty = [1 : 0]. Then the cross ratio is

\frac{w - y}{x - y}.

Remark. Note that the cross ratios from Case 2, 3, 4, and 5 may us think that we took each letter to infinity, but we didn't! In any case, this is great because we can just remember the expression from Case 1 as it recovers every other case.

Writing \lambda = \lambda(w,x,y,z) = \frac{(w -y)(z - x)}{(w - z)(y - x)} to mean the cross ratio of w, x, y, z, note that

  1. \lambda(w,y,x,z) = 1 - \lambda,
  2. \lambda(w,x,z,y) = 1/\lambda,
  3. \lambda(w,z,x,y) = 1 - 1/\lambda,
  4. \lambda(w,y,z,x) = 1/(1-\lambda),
  5. \lambda(w,z,y,x) = \lambda/(1-\lambda).

No comments:

Post a Comment

\mathbb{Z}_{p}[t]/(P(t)) is a DVR if P(t) is irreducible in \mathbb{F}_{p}[t]

Let p be a prime and P(t) \in \mathbb{Z}_{p}[t] a monic polynomial whose image in \mathbb{F}_{p} modulo p (which we also denote by $...